I had never consciously realized that the terms used for music and visual “composition” were actually the same. It is only now that I read into a bit of the history of how these terms came to be that I made the connection. But to be honest, it makes sense. Music is made of waves and so is color, one of the components of visuals. These two mediums use waves as a sub-medium. The focus of artists and musicians to deal with the material primarily would then make sense placed in this context. They do not have to worry about linking different types of arts with one another because their own nature is similar and links naturally due to the mediums they share (as is the example of both visuals and music using sound waves).

On the other hand, I really resonated with the fact that artists change their medium due to “purely pragmatic reasons”. I remember that in highschool, I wanted to be both on the school band and the art club, however, the professors that managed both groups forced students to give up on the other and commit only to one group regardless of whether or not the student had enough time to do both. I always felt quite discouraged about this because it forced me to choose one “box” rather than allowing me to explore both mediums. I believe that many schools have that narrow approach and I wonder whether we would see much more significant artworks and performances coming from students in normal schools (not art schools) if we did not push students to encapsulate themselves in one medium. Perhaps the art or performances won’t be the best, but I believe that it would certainly improve children’s overall artistic practice and creative process. This would then tie in with the concept that anyone can make noise and thus can create a sound composition. At the same time, anyone can create a visual and thus make a visual composition.

It seems that one of the main themes that the artists in this reading have is that they go back to the very basics of each medium and in a way question the established artistic or musical norm to make this artistic practices accessible to people. It would be interesting to see this applied not just in colleges or formal art institutions but in public schools.

When I started reading this article, what came to my mind was the concept of program music that I learned in “Introduction to the History of Western Music”. In this context, program music refers to music that carries some extramusical meaning, some “program” of literary idea, legend, and scenic Vivaldi’s “Four Seasons” Violin Concerto, for example, describes the four seasons as indicated in its title. When you listen to “Winter”, you can literally sense the cold wind blowing around you. This is also due to the rapidity of the violin playing in the piece. Anyway, what I want to point out here is that there was this kind of sense of combining music with graphics (scenes) during the classical music period, even though at first the graphics were often abstract and even did not exist in physical form (in people’s imagination).

 

As I read further, I found this interesting quote that says “the point was not to link different arts with one another but to find an appropriate means of expression for a particular idea, to test concepts in another field, or simply to extend one’s own radius of effect”. As we can see from the examples given in the article, the artists are not making cross-disciplinary art for the sake of making cross-disciplinary art. Instead, they conceptualized in their minds what ideas they wanted to realize before making cross-disciplinary art, and then tried to express their ideas in the form of cross-disciplinary art creation. This kind of creation is obviously experimental and highly groundbreaking.

 

At the end of the article, we can see that “the dual profession of artist-musician/musician-artist is no longer anything of note”, rather, “PR strategies demonstrate how an artist or musician’s own cultural product can benefit from the adaptation of the respective other systems”. I’m curious if this being tied up with commercial capital is an indication that the trend of cross-disciplinary art-making has become so popular that people have become accustomed to it, or if it is an indication that it is difficult to make commercial value that people are transitioning to art content that can make money for them.

This reading discusses how boundaries between different art forms being broken down in the 1960s allowed artists to create art that had a wider reach. Musicians were also picking up the paintbrush and vice versa. However, it did not stop at people becoming interdisciplinary. Artist-musicians were combining sounds and visuals in one performance, much like we do in our Live Coding class. The reading uses the word ‘synesthesia’ to describe this phenomenon. Synesthesia refers to when you experience one sense through another, for example, hearing shapes or tasting sound. It really is a beautiful way to create art. Rather than just painting a picture, why not combine visuals with sounds and paint what you see? In a way, I believe that human beings have been a little bit Synesthetic (is that a word?) since the beginning of time. What I mean by this is, when we hear music, we have certain colours we associate with the type of sounds we are listening to. For instance, when I listen to an upbeat pop song, I might envision bright colours alongside it such as pink, yellow, orange etc. If I go to a heavy metal concert, I will expect to see darker visuals.

Synesthesia is an important thing to consider when I create my Live Coding projects, such as what visuals best complement the sounds I am creating. The music and the visuals should not be treated as separate things, but as one new art form.

This reading contextualizes the way we see “musical art” today and how it was developed. It provides the theories and history behind its evolution as a concept and examples of works and artists in the field. There are several main ideas that I found to be relatable on a personal level, not in a way that they apply to me personally but rather based on my observations. Since we started this class, whenever we have a performance or look at documented works or experiences, I always think of house music or shows and concerts like Martin Garrix and similar artists. This, I feel, relates to section 5 which looks at the computer being a universal machine that combines clubs with galleries under a “one-person enterprise”(5). The author discusses how the artist-musician/musician-artist label has been influenced by the spread of electronic music such as techno and house. This led to clubs being a place that combines forms of expression like music and visuals, as well as other factors. I would say that such factors apply to concerts as well, alongside clubs. Not only does the performers’ music allow people to vibe, move with the beat, and dance together, but performing it live makes it 1000 times more interesting and captivating, engaging multiple senses at the same time. It creates some kind of immersive or 2D experience where you can see the visuals reacting with the audio/sounds and incorporating fire or smoke, in some cases, that also go with the beat.

I have been to many concerts in my life but I had the most fun at a Martin Garrix concert where I was close to the stage and could see all of the colors and visuals changing up close with the music. He also incorporated aspects that we have learned how to use in class such as images or videos within the visuals, which personalizes the performance even further and maybe incorporates the “filmic” form discussed in the reading. Another topic that I found to be very interesting when reading was how some terminology used for visuals has been taken from music to apply to paintings, for example, which we still use to this day. Referring to a visual work or producing it as a “composition, symphony, improvisation, or rhythm”(2) is a recent change, that emphasizes abstraction in art. However, I believe that there is a wider room for interpretation when it comes to understanding what each word means when applying it to visuals than it does for music.

General Overview

This assignment was quite a challenge! Composition is tough, especially in code format as it felt less intuitive for me. The way I tried to tackle this task is by consuming as much music and visuals that inspire me and trying to duplicate and play around with the resulting outcomes. For music, I realized that I’m not a big fan of typical EDM-ish build-ups, and find myself gravitating towards more experimental ambient music, so two of the main songs that were inspiring me for this project were: ATM by Billy Lemos, and An Encounter by The 1975. As for visuals, I wanted to steer away from coding shapes from scratch, rather I wanted to experiment with either layering the same video or source image.

Music

As mentioned above, I wanted to experiment with creating ambient and almost nostalgic sounds, but before all that I referred to music theory and the piano, and picked a scale that I thought would compliment the feel I’m going for, which is the C minor scale. I went through a lot of different samples and approaches to building the composition, and almost nothing felt like it made sense or like it’s cohesive. The final structure I went with is pretty experimental, a piece in two parts with the sound of children playing in the background. It’s meant to be both ominous and nostalgic both feelings that I attempted to achieve mostly by using room, sz, and orbit.

Visuals

Before starting, I knew I wanted to experiment with red-blue layered visuals with an anaglyph 3D effect. I played around with gifs and different figures, and then felt like a picture of an eye could be both visually appealing and match the vibe of the music. Throughout the whole piece, the eye is consistent as the source.

Difficulties

The biggest difficulties I faced are with compositional structure and audiovisual interaction. For compositional structure, as I mentioned, I struggled with finding an alternative to the build-up structure, as I felt like it did not resonate with the feel that I was trying to achieve. As for audiovisual interaction, I think I just need to practice it and experiment with it more until it becomes more precise and understandable for me.

---- start
d14 $ s "children" #gain 0.5

d13 $ qtrigger 13 $ seqPLoop[
  (0, 4,  note "[[ef5'maj] [g5'min] [bf5'maj] ~ ~]" # sound "superfork" # room 0.1 # gain 0.7 # legato 1.5),
  (4, 8, note "[[ef5'maj] [g5'min] [c6'min] ~ ~]" # sound "superfork" # room 0.1 # gain 0.7 # legato 1.5)
  ]

d7 $ ccv "0 50 64 0 0" # ccn "0" # s "midi"

d7 silence



d1 $ s "coins" # gain 0.8



d5 $ slow 2 $ sound "superfork" >| note "[c2'min]? [bf3'min]?"  # room 0.1 # gain 0.9 -- bg chord


-- introducing more rhythm + ambient element
hush

d3 $ qtrigger 3 $ seqPLoop[
  (0, 12, fast 2 $  sound "808bd(1,4)"  # gain 1.2),
  (4, 12,slow 2 $ sound " ~ [future:4(3,5)]  ~ ~"  # gain 1.5 # room 0.4)
  ]

  d11 $ ccv (segment 128 (range 127 0 saw)) # ccn "1" # s "midi"
  d9  $ struct "<~ t(3,5) t>" $ ccv ((segment 128 (range 127 0 saw))) # ccn "2" # s "midi"


d4 $ fast 2 $ s "ade:3"  |> note "<f5_>" # cut 1  # vowel "o"  # gain "<1? 0.9 0.2 0.7>"   #room 0.4


-- chaos & tension here w/ distort & adding beats

bassDrum = d14 $ fast 2 $ sound "808bd" # gain 1.2

bassDrum
d3 $ slow 2 $ sound "[future:4*3] ~ ~ ~"  # gain 1.5 # room 0.4 # distort 0.2
d5  $ struct "<t(3,5) t>" $ ccv ((segment 128 (range 127 0 saw))) # ccn "3" # s "midi"

d4 $ fast 2 $ s "ade:3*6"  |> note "<f5_>" # cut 1  # vowel "o"  # gain "<1? 0.9 0.2 0.7>"   #room 0.4

--- hush, instead of a drop for ominous vibe
hush

------ second bit, normal then degrade
d4 $ degradeBy 0.8 $ slow 2 $ s "armora:5" # room 0.4 # sz 0.6 # orbit 1 # gain 0.8
d1 $ s "<coins(1,4)>" # gain 0.95

d5  $  ccv " 127 0 0 0 0" # ccn "3" # s "midi"


d4 silence

d10 $ qtrigger 10 $ seqP[
  (0, 8, s "ade:3" |> note "c2"  # cut 1  # vowel "a"  # orbit 1 # room 0.7 ),
  (8, 14, s "ade:3" |> note "c3"  # cut 1  # vowel "a"  # orbit 1 # room 0.7),
  (14, 20, s  "ade:3" |> note "c4"  # cut 1  # vowel "a"  # orbit 1 # room 0.7)
  ]

d1 silence
hush
s2.initImage("https://i.pinimg.com/originals/b1/7b/6e/b17b6e0ba062a3217ecd873634093864.png")
s3.initImage("https://i.pinimg.com/originals/b1/7b/6e/b17b6e0ba062a3217ecd873634093864.png")


src(s2).scale(() => cc[0]*0.5,4,8).pixelate(600,600).scrollX(0.3,0.01).out(o0) // start, one eye layer

//() => cc[0]*0.5

src(s2).scale(0.02,4,8).color(1,0,0).scrollX(0.01,0.1).layer(src(s2).scale( () => cc[0]*0.1,4,8).pixelate(600,600).scrollX(0.2,0.1)).out(o0)

.layer().out(o0)

src(s2).scale( () => cc[0]*0.1,4,8).pixelate(600,600).scrollX(0.7,0.1).layer(src(s2).scale(()=>cc[1]/6,4,8).color(1,0,0).scrollX(0.,0.1)).rotate(() => cc[2]).out(o0)  // () => cc[2] //rotation n scaling for red

src(s2).scale( () => cc[0]*0.01,4,8).pixelate(600,600).scrollX(0.7,0.1).layer(src(s2).scale(()=>cc[2]/10,4,8).color(1,0,0).modulate(noise(()=> cc[1]*6)).scrollX(0.,0.1)).out(o0) //modulate noise

src(s2).scale( () => cc[0]*0.01,4,8).pixelate(600,600).scrollX(0.7,0.1).layer(src(s2).scale(()=>cc[2]/10,4,8).color(1,0,0).modulate(noise(()=> cc[1]*2)).pixelate(()=>cc[3]*2).scrollX(0.,0.1)).out(o0) //pixelate



osc(6).color(1,0,0).modulate(src(s2).scale(0.1,4,8),1).blend(osc(6).color(0,0,2).modulate(src(s2).scale(0.1,4,8).scrollX(0.7),1).modulate(noise(()=>cc[3]+0.3))).out(o0) // part 2

osc(6).color(1,0,0).modulate(src(s2).scale(0.1,4,8),1).blend(osc(6).color(0,0,2).modulate(src(s2).scale(0.1,4,8).scrollX(0.7),1).brightness(()=> +0.8).modulate(noise(()=>cc[3]))).out(o0) //brightness

Concept:

For this assignment, I tried so many things that were not coming together. I had some very interesting visuals and I spent so much time crafting melodies (even used the piano in class to try out new patterns), but they were not coming along together. Then last week I had a very deep reflection on water and how we usually associate the sounds of water as something relaxing, but water can be very dangerous and wild depending on the context. To me water can be very relaxing but also very anxiety-inducing under certain conditions. It was somewhat of a deeply personal moment of introspection that inspired me to create water-like visuals and then come up with a soundscape to match them.

I was really interested in exploring my relationship with water and I came up with a story for that. I decided to use lines of the story as a way to name my functions in Tidalcycles. I personally really enjoyed this idea and thought it was one of the most appealing aspects of my presentation.

Music:

For the music, I wanted to emphasize the calmness of the ocean and then build it up to a very chaotic place, reminiscent of a storm.

The music was the trickiest part of the assignment. I was very locked into the idea of traditional composition, but even though I was able to come up with very nice melodies, I could not come up with beats that matched the melody well. It was very hard to get those to match and I spent a lot of time working on sound elements that I ended up not incorporating into my presentation.

After narrowing down a theme for my performance and coming up with the story that I want to tell, I actually threw away my more traditional composition approach and just started playing around with sounds that I found appealing and how to merge them with the rest of my music.

I think music was where I spent the bulk of my time. It was very hard, but I tried to keep myself organized with the code and that really help me tailor the kind of sound experience that I wanted to create. I also loved the Mask function in Tidalcycles. I watched this performance by Dan Gorelick. He uses mask in a very playful way and I thought that it would be a nice way to live code but at the same time have an outcome that will be synced to the rest of the music. It was very fun to try mask out and come up with different beats.

I am very happy with the organization of my code. Maybe it won’t make much sense to someone seen the code, but I understand very well how I placed things together and how I use variables and functions in the code.

by_The_Ocean

lived_A_Man

who_Manned

d9 $ a_lighthouse 1 "t t t t"

but_he_didnt_like

the_Ocean

because_it_was_beautiful

but_dangerous

so_when_the

storm_hits

he_has_to

go_up

_the_lighthouse

and_sound

the_alarm

to_warn_people

when_the_storm_stops

the_man_repeats_this

until_the_ocean_is_silent

hush


-- Evaluate before performance

-- to send cc values
do
  d11 $ ccv "20 40 64 127" # ccn "0" # s "midi"
  d12 $ ccv "0 20 64 127" # ccn "2" # s "midi"

but_he_didnt_like = do
  d1 $ slow 2 $ s "wind" <| note ("bf a g d") # room 0.5
  d2 $ slow 2 $ s "newnotes" <| note ("bf a g d") # room 0.5
  d3 $ slow 2 $ s "gtr" <| note ("bf a g d" + 12) # room 0.5
  d13 $ ccv "2" # ccn "3" # s "midi"

the_Ocean = do
  d1 $ every 4 (+ "c6 as a as")$ slow 2 $ s "wind" <| note "bf a g d"# room 0.5
  d2 $ every 4 (+ "c6 as a as")$ slow 2 $ s "newnotes" <| note "bf a g d"# room 0.5
  d3 $ every 4 (+ "c6 as a as")$ slow 2 $ s "pluck" <| note ("bf a g d" + 12)# room 0.5
  d4 $ every 4 (+ "c6 as a as")$ slow 2 $ s "pluck" <| note ("bf a g d")# room 0.5
  d11 $ ccv "20 40 64 127 [0 10] [70 50] [90] [100]" # ccn "0" # s "midi"
  d13 $ ccv "3" # ccn "3" # s "midi"

because_it_was_beautiful = do
  d5 $ slow 2 $ s "em2" <| note ("[e5 d5 ~] [c5 b4 ~] [a4 g4 ~] [f4 e4 ~]") # gain 1.2
  d6 $ slow 2 $ s "wind" <| note ("[e5 d5 ~] [c5 b4 ~] [a4 g4 ~] [f4 e4 ~]")
  d7 $ slow 2 $ s "newnotes" <| note ("[e5 d5 ~] [c5 b4 ~] [a4 g4 ~] [f4 e4 ~]" + 12) # gain 1.2
  d13 $ ccv "4" # ccn "3" # s "midi"

but_dangerous = do
  d1 $ n (arpg "'major7 [0,4,7,11]") # sound "wind"
  d2 $ n (arpg "'major7 [0,4,7,11]") # sound "newnotes"
  d3 $ n (arpg "'major7 [0,4,7,11]" - 12) # sound "pluck"
  d4 $ n (arpg "'major7 [0,4,7,11]" - 38) # sound "pluck"
  xfade 5 silence
  xfade 6 silence
  xfade 7 silence
  d13 $ ccv "5" # ccn "3" # s "midi"

-- cuerdas
so_when_the = do
  xfade 3 $ slow 2 $
    n (off 0.25 (+12) $ off 0.125 (+7) $ "c(3,8) a(3,8,2) f(3,8) e(3,8,4)")
    # sound "pluck"
  d7 $ s "hh*8"

-- storm is coming
storm_hits = do d1 $ jux rev $ s "sine*8" # note (scale "iwato" "0 .. 8" + "f3" ) # room 0.9 # gain 0.6

he_has_to = do
  d1 $ n (arpg "'major7 [0,4,7,11]") # sound "trump"
  d13 $ ccv "6" # ccn "3" # s "midi"

--storm
go_up = do
  d1 $ slow 2 $ s "superpiano" <| note ("[e5 d5 ~] [c5 b4 ~] [a4 g4 ~] [f4 e4 ~]")
  d2 $ slow 2 $ s "pluck:2" <| note ("[e5 d5 ~] [c5 b4 ~] [a4 g4 ~] [f4 e4 ~]" + 24) # gain 1.2
  d4 $ slow 2 $ s "gtr" <| note ("[e5 d5 ~] [c5 b4 ~] [a4 g4 ~] [f4 e4 ~]" + 24)
  d5 $ slow 2 $ s "em2" <| note ("[e5 d5 ~] [c5 b4 ~] [a4 g4 ~] [f4 e4 ~]") # gain 1.2
  d6 $ slow 2 $ s "wind" <| note ("[e5 d5 ~] [c5 b4 ~] [a4 g4 ~] [f4 e4 ~]")
  d7 $ slow 2 $ s "newnotes" <| note ("[e5 d5 ~] [c5 b4 ~] [a4 g4 ~] [f4 e4 ~]" + 12) # gain 1.2
  d8 $ slow 2 $ s "notes" <| note ("[e5 d5 ~] [c5 b4 ~] [a4 g4 ~] [f4 e4 ~]"+ 12) # gain 1.2
  d13 $ ccv "7" # ccn "3" # s "midi"

_the_lighthouse = do d1 $  fast 2 $ s "hh*2 hh*2 hh*2 <hh*6 [hh*2]!3>" # room 0.7 # gain (range 1 1.2 rand)

and_sound = do
  d8 $ a_lighthouse 1 "t t t t"
  d13 $ ccv "8" # ccn "3" # s "midi"

  -- High Hat beat
the_alarm = do
  xfade 5 $ alarm
  d13 $ ccv "9" # ccn "3" # s "midi"

-- maybe the alarm
to_warn_people = do xfade 9 $ slow 2 $ n (off 0.25 (+12) $ off 0.125 (+7) $ "c(3,8) a(3,8,2) f(3,8) e(3,8,4)") # sound "trump"

-- After buildup
when_the_storm_stops = do
  d1 silence
  d2 silence
  d3 $ s "sax" # note (arp "updown"(scale "major" ("[0,2,4,6]" +" <0 0 9 8>") + "f5"))
  d4 silence
  d5 silence
  d6 silence
  d7 silence
  d8 silence
  d9 silence
  d13 $ ccv "10" # ccn "3" # s "midi"

alarm = stack[
  s "~ trump" # room 0.5,
  fast 2 $ s "gtr*2 gtr*2 gtr*2 " # room 0.7 # gain (range 1 1.2 rand)] # speed (slow 4 (range 1 2 saw))

-- Ending

the_man_repeats_this = do
 xfade 1 $ s "em2:2" <| note ("c [d e] c")
 d3 silence
 d13 $ ccv "11" # ccn "3" # s "midi"

until_the_ocean_is_silent = do
  xfade 1 silence
  d13 $ ccv "12" # ccn "3" # s "midi"

-- Ambience
by_The_Ocean = do
  xfade 15 $ slow 4 $ s "sheffield" # gain 0.7 -- ambience
  d14 $ slow 8 $ s "pebbles" # gain 0.7 -- very long, maybe pebbles on a beach
  d3 $ slow 8 $ s "birds" <| n (run 4)# legato 1.8
  d13 $ ccv "0" # ccn "3" # s "midi"

lived_A_Man = do
  d3 silence
  d3 $ qtrigger 3 $ slow 8 $ s "em2:2" <| note ("[b ~] [a ~] [g ~] [e ~]")

who_Manned = do
  d1 $ s "bd bd cp ~"
  d13 $ ccv "1" # ccn "3" # s "midi"

a_lighthouse speed t = slow speed $ mask t $ sound "clubkick clubkick clubkick [clubkick clubkick clubkick]"

 

Visuals:

The visuals were very fun to make. Again, a lot of the things I made were not used, but I did notice a pattern in the types of animations I was creating, which were very similar to the way water behaves. I decided to narrow down my visuals to those that reflected water behaviour (both the calm and the storm).

While I was practising, I was struggling a lot between triggering things in Tidal and then going to the hydra and vice-versa. It was very overwhelming for me because of how much code I had. So, after trying to optimize my triggering skills, I decided to instead automize the visuals by using the update() function and controlling which visual is shown through one of the cc value arrays (channel 3). This took away the pressure of modifying things in both files, so I could just focus on the music and that would change the visuals without me having to do it into the js file.

To be honest, I really thought that I was been selective with my visuals because I got to narrow them down to a theme and even then, I did not use all of my water-related animations. However, I see now that it was not enough and I should have trimmed down on the visuals more. It would have been better to dedicate more time to how using the cc[] could modify the visual into something completely different.

update = () =>
{
  if(ccActual[3] == 0) ocean() //by the ocean
  if(ccActual[3] == 1) sparklingWater() // who Manned
  if(ccActual[3] == 2) drop()// he didn't like
  if(ccActual[3] == 3) honda() //ocean
  if(ccActual[3] == 4) waterwheel() //beautifu;
  if(ccActual[3] == 5) psychoWave() //dangerous
  if(ccActual[3] == 6) wave()// he has to
  if(ccActual[3] == 7) splash()//go up
  if(ccActual[3] == 8) storm()//sound
  if(ccActual[3] == 9) hurricane() // the alarm
  if(ccActual[3] == 10) dripple() //sax
  if(ccActual[3] == 11) ocean() // repeats
  if(ccActual[3] == 12) hush() //silent
}

//THINGS THAT WORKED

//wavey water
// b = 0
// update = () => b += 0.001 * Math.sin(time)

wave = ()=> voronoi(()=>ccActual[0],0,0).color(.2,0.3,0.9)
  .modulateScrollY(osc(10),0.5,0)
  .out()

  dripple()

//storm
storm = ()=> shape(2).mask(noise(10,0.1)).color(1,0,0).invert(1).rotate(()=>6+Math.sin(time)*cc[0]).out()

drop = ()=> shape(2).mask(noise(cc[0],0.1)).color(1,0,0).invert(1).rotate(()=>6+Math.sin(time)*cc[0]).out()

hurricane = ()=> voronoi()
  .add(gradient().invert(1))
  .rotate(({time})=>(time%360)/2)
  .modulate(osc(25,0.1,0.5)
              .kaleid(50)
              .scale(({time})=>Math.sin(time*cc[0])*0.5+1)
              .modulate(noise(0.6,0.5)),
              0.5)
  .out()


splash = ()=>gradient().color(1,0,1).invert(1).saturate(5)
  .add(voronoi(50,0.3,0.3)).repeat(10,10).kaleid([3,5,7,9].fast(cc[0])).modulateScale(osc(4,-0.5,0),15,0).out()

dripple = ()=> gradient().invert(1).kaleid([3,5,7,9].fast(0.5))
.modulateScale(osc(cc[2],-0.5,1).kaleid(50).scale(0.5),10,0)
.out()

drippleActual = ()=> gradient().invert(1).kaleid([3,5,7,9].fast(0.5))
.modulateScale(osc(()=>ccActual[2],-0.5,1).kaleid(50).scale(ccActual[0]),10,0)
.out()

//wavy pattern
  psychoWave = ()=>shape(4,0.95)
    .mult(osc(0.75,1,0.65))
    .hue(0.9)
    .modulateRepeatX(
      osc(10, 5.0, ({time}) => Math.sin(time*(cc[0])))
    )
    .scale(10,0.5,0.05) //first value could be a cc
  .out()

// honda
honda = ()=> osc(10,-0.25,1)
    .color(0,0.1,0.9)
    .saturate(8).hue(0.9)
    .kaleid(50)
    .mask(
        noise(25,2)
        .modulateScale(noise(0.25,0.05))
      )
    .modulateScale(
      osc(6,-0.5,()=>cc[2])
      .kaleid(50)
    )
    .scale(()=>cc[2],0.5,0.75)
    .out()

    // background of house
    waterwheel = ()=> noise(10, 0.1).color(1,0.5,0.5).invert([1]).add(shape(2,0.8).kaleid(()=>6+Math.sin(time)*4)).out()


sparklingWater = ()=> noise(25,2).invert(0).color(0.7, 0.9, 1).saturate(4).modulateScale(noise(()=>cc[2],0.05)).out()

ocean = ()=> osc(1,1,0).color(0,0,1).hue(0.9).modulatePixelate(noise(5,1),()=>cc[0]).out()

 

Performance:

Link to Performance
My computer slows down a lot when I try to record the audio from supercollider, so I decided to just screenrecord.

Reflection:

I felt like this assignment made me really grasp how things work in TidalCycles. I spent a lot of time going through the documentation and trying out things. Hydra was a bit more about experimenting, but I liked the idea of using Update as a way to automize certain things and not have to worry about both triggering things in Tidal and in Hydra. My understanding of both was really reinforced and expanded.

However, I do think that I could have been more selective on the visuals and maybe should have focused more on transitions. Because I tried so many things out that I ended up not using, I felt like as long as the visuals were coherent in themes and palette with each other then my performance would be good. I was a bit blinded by how much I did vs how much I should be doing on my presentation.

I really liked some of the visuals I created and I would have liked to maybe do more in the interaction of the visual with the cc values, not just triggering things and scaling but also transforming the visual. I also thought that automating certain things was something smart that I was doing to help myself but I think it ended up downgrading the overall experience of the performance.

I practised a lot for this assignment and I think that made me have certain thinking of how well the performance was working compared to my previous versions of the assignment, but now I see that just because the performance is better than when I previously practised, that doesn’t mean that it’s good overall. I think there were a lot of things I was lacking because I was worried about the wrong things. I think that now that I am looking back on the performance more clearly, I can definitely see that my concept was good but the execution was not as well planned as I had falsely thought and the result was not what I thought.

I think that maybe I should have put more of myself out there in the performance and though the topic was very mine, the execution could have been better. I really like the idea of using my artwork combined with hydra for the visuals of my performances and I think I really want to explore that this second half of the semester.

I was inspired by the music box gif on the giphy website. I want to have the main melody which is To Alice. Throughout the whole composition, there are three main components. The first one is the verse, which in context includes when the music box is turned on and winded and plays beautiful tunes. However, it follows the distortion. I introduced the distortion by varying the speed of the melody so that it sounds like rewinding the music. To go with the music, I found a gif on giphy to present to the audience the music box being played.

It is convenient that the gif is already creepy in some ways because it facilitates my chorus, which I use to portray the increasingly broken music box. Composition wise, I added lower end melody using different samples as the original one, as well as changing the beats a little to give the composition piece more variety. As for the visuals, I introduced noise into the giphy to simulate chaotic features. Moreover, In the second half of the chorus, I use heavy electric guitar sound to push the music to a peak. At the same time, the visuals are even more chaotic and by using feedbacks, I was able to convey the emotion of fear.

Next is the bridge. To contrast with the chorus, I slowed down music and added some bass. In the visuals, chaos are gone, instead there is slowed and smooth distortion I created using blend function. 

I think the performance could be improved by a more cohesive use of visuals, sounds as well as midi. I These would facilitate me in telling the story since the audience won’t be distracted by the incoherent movement between different parts of music or visuals. I have pasted the YouTube video here: