I think the author’s understanding of “feel” in music is significant in the context of computational music. If musical feel emerges from microscopic deviations in timing and intensity, then computational systems expose a clear tension: computers prioritize precision, while groove often depends on subtle imprecision. Strict quantization can therefore erase the traces of bodily presence that make rhythms sound relaxed or “in the pocket”, even when they are metrically correct.

This tension becomes especially clear in live coding. While live coding environments often emphasize algorithmic structure and real-time precision, they also introduce a performative and temporal dimension that reopens space for musical feel. Rather than encoding a fixed groove in advance, live coding unfolds in time, making timing decisions visible and responsive. Small changes in code, like shifting delays, densities or rhythmic patterns function less as abstract instructions and more as gestures comparable to microtiming adjustments in embodied performance.