To define something is to stake a claim to its future, to make a claim about what it should be or become. This makes me hesitate to define live coding.

This quote caught my eye as soon as I started reading the text, it resonated with me because I think it captures the fluid and dynamic nature of live coding. It is fascinating to see live coding not just as a technical practice but as an artistic/creative approach that challenges programming norms. Before this class, I associated the phrase “live coding” with writing efficient code in real time for some work related things. However, now I think of it as an improv performance, something similar to rap freestyles, thus making me rethink the rigid perception of programming.

I found it kind of intriguing how live coding embraces transparency, exposing the thought process behind the code and allowing the audience to witness the creative journey in real time. Of course it comes with some extra pressure on the programmer/artist because everything needs to be done live and mistakes can make the performance a bit awkward. This visibility challenges the traditional black-box approach in tech, where software operates behind the scenes.

Live coding changed the notion of coding for me, now I see coding as an entity that adapts and evolves with me as a potential performer. The more I practice, the more I would be able to create and express via coding. It is safe to say that I started to appreciate coding not just like a tool but as a medium of self-expression.