“I consider randomness a relativistic phenomenon: any signal, no matter how internally consistent or meaningful it is within its own context, may be perceived as random noise relative to some other coherent signal.”

In this reading, the author delves into the topic of music composition and randomness, and makes us question whether musical composition even exists. The author argues that randomness is relative, and that any sound, if placed in a different context, can be considered random sound. I am not convinced by this argument. Firstly, I do not believe that random, unpredictable sounds make a ‘composition’ more musical. I believe that all music has meaning, and if a series of random sounds are arranged together, there is no meaning behind it and therefore it is not music.

Putting this in the context of live coding, I don’t know if I can call the sounds created by live coding ‘music’, mainly because live coding relies on unpredictability and randomness as an art form. Perhaps a live coding piece which has already been rehearsed, with each sound predetermined could be considered music, but I personally believe that live coding is only ‘live’ if the artist engages in some improvisation.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>